![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Panasonic X300 is a strange thing.. it's got a flip-out viewfinder like a digital camcorder. The only problem is that the rest of the phone is rubbish. It's almost as if Panasonic were living in a time warp 12 months ago.. they've burdened the X300 with a VGA camera and what appears to be a titchy little screen... sigh.
Come on Panasonic, you can do better than this! |
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Panasonic X300
Definately a weird phone. And it's more expensive than the Siemens CX65!
__________________
Btw, it's C Dover, not CD over...nor cd cover.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Panasonic as a manufacturer isnt coming up fast. Like sharp, SE, Samsung, MOTO are giving NOKIA a tough time.
__________________
www.iBikers.net - The indian biking experts! |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Last edited by Ack : 07-27-2004 at 03:25 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
its gota be the stupidest designed phone ive ever seen. 128x128 screen..wtf... 4mb internal memory, wtf... no expansion.. wtf.. vga camera.. its the stupidest phone ever..like who gives a damn that it can flip out.. big woopededoo
__________________
The time has come to choose my last phone for the next few years.... what will it be... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Haha, i guess dont really care about their mobile phones cause they got other products too, Unlike nokia and se.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But.. and this is a big but.. the phones tend to look quite pretty and they sell on looks alone. And if they're selling, well, then why should Panasonic care too much? Panasonic have about a 5% market share worldwide on this basis, which is not too bad I suppose. Getting a little back on topic, the X300 is a very poor phone indeed with a crappy display and digital camera. Panasonic's unique selling proposition with this pretty much amounts to putting a hinged display in and moving the camera on to the site. Yes, it looks impressive at first glance, but of course it's rubbish. Now.. if it had the Sharp GX30's camera and display then it would ROCK. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
hey, the X300's the phone that i saw being advertised in Star Sports
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah Samsung make everything from electronics to ships. Although frustratingly they don't seem to do Bluetooth and phones tend to be dual band, they're still better than Panasonic.
In fact, it's hard to think of a manufacturer that produces less interesting phones. The odd thing is that the phones Panasonic make for the Japanese market seem to be really good. Go figure. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yeah, Samsung (I believe) wasn't part of the original Bluetooth group, so they had to design and make their own (and just recently completed, which is why we havn't seen Bluetooth in Samsung phones yet...).Quote:
__________________
Btw, it's C Dover, not CD over...nor cd cover.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
i prefer gd87 over the majority of samsung phones at the time that both were released...but now panasonic have seemed to relax on makin super phones and thought...hey lets make the wierd one sno one'll buy...for a laff
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
Btw, it's C Dover, not CD over...nor cd cover.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well going back to the topic of the thread, this X300 seems like one really crappy phone.
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 PM.










Yeah, Samsung (I believe) wasn't part of the original Bluetooth group, so they had to design and make their own (and just recently completed, which is why we havn't seen Bluetooth in Samsung phones yet...).
Linear Mode
