MobileBurn Forums

Go Back   MobileBurn Forums > Phones and Accessories > Other Manufacturers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Do you think Apple made a mistake by going with Cingular?
Yes 3 33.33%
Maybe 1 11.11%
No 3 33.33%
Yes, coz they should sell it unlocked! 2 22.22%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2007, 10:46 PM
difenbaker's Avatar
difenbaker difenbaker is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,184
Reputation: 664
Rep Power: 18
Rep Bar: difenbaker has a reputation beyond reputedifenbaker has a reputation beyond reputedifenbaker has a reputation beyond reputedifenbaker has a reputation beyond reputedifenbaker has a reputation beyond reputedifenbaker has a reputation beyond repute
Do you think Apple made a mistake?

Hi there,

Do you think Apple made a mistake by going with Cingular?



cheers!
__________________
function can't coffee without in the morning... Dif's Place
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:23 PM
carcomptoy's Avatar
carcomptoy carcomptoy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 8,184
Reputation: 238
Rep Power: 16
Rep Bar: carcomptoy has a reputation beyond reputecarcomptoy has a reputation beyond reputecarcomptoy has a reputation beyond repute
I'm going to go with maybe. I don't want to say something outright and then just turn out to be completely wrong and be an idiot. The RAZR was on Cingular exclusively for a while, and look where it is now. Then again, it was available globally concurrently.

So my maybe is leaning more towards yes than no that they made a mistake. I mean, come on, consider that it's expensive with carrier subsidization anyway, why not just have it unlocked. There's nothing Cingular supports specifically aside from Visual Voicemail that the iPhone would be crippled without. An unlocked iPhone would work just as well, if not better on other networks.
__________________
RIM BB Curve 8320
Nokia 3390, 8390, 3300, 2190, 1100, N-Gage Original, 3650, 9500 (sold), E70
Moto StarTAC 3000, V60g, T725e, RAZR V3, ROKR E6
Samsung R225m
SE t68m, T300, T637
Siemens SX1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:38 PM
problematic problematic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: mm,phil.
Posts: 326
Reputation: 190
Rep Power: 5
Rep Bar: problematic has a reputation beyond reputeproblematic has a reputation beyond repute
I think they should've sold it unlocked.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2007, 02:33 AM
MikeUK's Avatar
MikeUK MikeUK is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 1,385
Reputation: 180
Rep Power: 8
Rep Bar: MikeUK has a reputation beyond reputeMikeUK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to MikeUK
I think they've made a good choice, it's a safe way to start out especially when you're knew to the industry, and they're going to be expanding it to other providers later on anway.
__________________
-Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2007, 03:40 AM
stephanie's Avatar
stephanie stephanie is offline
2006 MobileBurner Of The Year
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 582
Reputation: 205
Rep Power: 6
Rep Bar: stephanie has a reputation beyond reputestephanie has a reputation beyond reputestephanie has a reputation beyond repute
I agree they should sell it unlocked. Then just offer a "carrier version" with additional features, like visual voicemail, push mail, and other stuff. That way the buyer would have a choice to buy it "bare" or "with add-ons", just like buying a car.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2007, 03:59 AM
Jose_R.A.M's Avatar
Jose_R.A.M Jose_R.A.M is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8,365
Reputation: 326
Rep Power: 18
Rep Bar: Jose_R.A.M has a reputation beyond reputeJose_R.A.M has a reputation beyond reputeJose_R.A.M has a reputation beyond reputeJose_R.A.M has a reputation beyond repute
As in going with Cingular themselves or any network?

Just what's been posted here before, iPhone being apple's first phone, it needs to overwhelm us with the full experience of what their handset has been designed to do.

Selling it unlocked would be cool, people would buy it and stick their own sim into it, but then perhaps will never get to use carrier specific features which could raise the phone's functionality and improve user experience 10 fold.

Whether Cingular can be the one to provide that is another thing...but as MikeUK said, it's a safe way to start out nonetheless.
__________________
http://forums.mobileburn.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=861&dateline=11642170  19Today's Post | Rules| Register | RSS | BLOG
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2007, 04:43 AM
mweb6161onMB's Avatar
mweb6161onMB mweb6161onMB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: northern england
Posts: 223
Reputation: 89
Rep Power: 5
Rep Bar: mweb6161onMB has a reputation beyond repute
I'm unfamilier with the US market, but tying into just one network in the European market is the kiss of death IMO!!
__________________
Mobile review Administrator
SE-NSE.com Global moderator
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:22 AM
crazyze crazyze is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 715
Reputation: 103
Rep Power: 6
Rep Bar: crazyze has a reputation beyond reputecrazyze has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by mweb6161onMB View Post
I'm unfamilier with the US market, but tying into just one network in the European market is the kiss of death IMO!!
I agree
__________________
Blah
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-16-2007, 07:28 AM
TheZodiac's Avatar
TheZodiac TheZodiac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New England - USA
Posts: 1,585
Reputation: 116
Rep Power: 9
Rep Bar: TheZodiac has a reputation beyond reputeTheZodiac has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to TheZodiac
I didnt vote because I think there are a multiute of answers. Since they went GSM, I do believe they should sell it unlocked. The thing is, there is a backend infrastructure that goes along with some of apples unique offerings with the iPhone. For instance, the Visial Voice mail that lets you pick and choose which voicemails to listen too. That service is in conjunction with software running at Cingulars end. Much like a Sidekick, which needs an agreement to feed web data through Dangers servers for internet access with Tmobile (and others).

Though, I am not totally displeased with "regular" voicemail, I wouldnt mind giving up that feature to stick with Tmobile and their IMMENSE hotspot infrastructure.
__________________
Watch the Sky
-=TheZodiac=-
GODMODE: take the gold pill
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:33 AM
carcomptoy's Avatar
carcomptoy carcomptoy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 8,184
Reputation: 238
Rep Power: 16
Rep Bar: carcomptoy has a reputation beyond reputecarcomptoy has a reputation beyond reputecarcomptoy has a reputation beyond repute
But it seems like the only Cingular's providing for the iPhone is Visual Voicemail. That could be implemented by any other carrier. It's not like Cingular's going to provide 3G with it or music downloads...there's nothing really substantial that Cingular's providing.

It should have been unlocked especially since it was GSM. I would understand if it were CDMA, like with the Chocolate.
__________________
RIM BB Curve 8320
Nokia 3390, 8390, 3300, 2190, 1100, N-Gage Original, 3650, 9500 (sold), E70
Moto StarTAC 3000, V60g, T725e, RAZR V3, ROKR E6
Samsung R225m
SE t68m, T300, T637
Siemens SX1
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.


good stuff
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2006, Michael F. Oryl Jr.