Sony k700 or Samsung e600

[baby_boi069]

Man i need some help, i cant choose which phone to get the Sony Ericsson k700, or the Samsung e600? The SE has loads of features with camera and video but then again theres the Samsung e600 is a nice little clamshell phone, with a nice outter LCD. I dont kno i really need to upgrade lol cause i have a nokia 3310. :D and i kno that phone is old. Well if someone can help id be very thankful.

[sir50pence]

K700 no question about it!

[baby_boi069]

really no question lol.....what about the clamshell design and the good quality of samsung screens? Which phone has better baterry life?

[sir50pence]

The new firmware sorted K700's battery life to accebtable levels and samsung is famous for it's bad battery life and K700 has a brillent screen and if you favor the e600's clamshell design that's your opinion.

[silentfinny]

Let's just say that E600 is the same phone like S300 only with an intergrated camera built on it and a K700i is far more powerful in term of function-wise. Throwing money down on a phone which has the same function and same physical design isn't worth it, don't you think?

[sir50pence]

Preach! :D

[Box215]

Well i personally have found that Samsung phones are more about looks that brains. And the K700 is not only gorgeous, it can do quite a lot. Stay away from Samsung, you will get bored very quickly. And whats with Samsung apparent no-connectivity campaign? None of their phones to date have had working irda or bluetooth.

[commedecargons]

Well i personally have found that Samsung phones are more about looks that brains. And the K700 is not only gorgeous, it can do quite a lot. Stay away from Samsung, you will get bored very quickly. And whats with Samsung apparent no-connectivity campaign? None of their phones to date have had working irda or bluetooth.


Yupe. Getting gadgets (Which new stuffs are pouring out almost every 2 months) are all about getting something u won't regret in 2-3 months time. Looks of a phone may only last u for around 5 weeks or so.........

[prateek]

well samsung phones have no features at all as compared to sony ericsson,motorola and nokia.
they r just bout looks and you tend to get tired of em really easily.
i had a v200 for 2 months
got tired of it in a week as it had nothin good in it except the looks factor
and hey even if u decide only on the basis of looks i recommend the k700i(it doesnt look bad infact it looks gr8)
no chance for a samsung.

[baby_boi069]

Thanks for all your help yea i guess looks do get boring after awhile. I like the k700's design and the features thanks guys

[sir50pence]

You made a good choice, you won't regret it.

[Boasy]

K700 mate!!!

[sir50pence]

If you can, Wait and save up and get the S700.

[kyoots]

k700 is it!

[bart]

K700 without adoubt. i wonder who samsung even makes phones with those antenna's on them

[cdover]

K700 without adoubt. i wonder who samsung even makes phones with those antenna's on them

Antenna's lower the radiation level (I think...). I'm sure they're just thinking for the safetly of the consumer! :D.

[sir50pence]

I never knew that, I though it was for a better reception.You learn something new everyday.

[Box215]

Antenna's lower the radiation level (I think...). I'm sure they're just thinking for the safetly of the consumer! :D.

I dont think they lower radiation levels. I think sir50pence is right. THe Z600 has an internal antenna and the SAR level is .16 w/kg, by far the lowest ive seen

[cdover]

I though it was for a better reception..

Or was it for better reception? One of those two. Darn, will look for the link, I learnt that from this forum (I think it was one of the Mods who said that...) I don't know...will look.

[darkwolf]

Yeah get k700 man, u´ll love it, i´m looking to it also, but need to boost my budget.

[sir50pence]

I never knew it was out in mexico.